ForecastGeo Log in
← All stories

How three colonial powers gained – and then lost – control over the straits of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb

Over recent months, the straits of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb have become synonymous with geopolitical jostling. Whoever controls these narrow waterways governs the flow of maritime traffic from the Arabian Sea and the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean – and with it, a vitally significant chunk of global trade. However, conflict over these straits is almost as old as modern maritime trade itself. The war between the US and Iran over these chokepoints is just the latest chapter in a centuries-long…

Where: India, Pakistan, Iran, China, Portugal, Beijing

Exact coordinates

india: 20.590, 78.960
pakistan: 30.380, 69.350
iran: 32.430, 53.690
china: 35.860, 104.200
portugal: 39.400, -8.220
beijing: 39.900, 116.400

Read it at The Conversation See this on the map

What might happen next? AI-generated

These scenarios are written by an AI language model from the headline and summary above. They are not predictions from the newsroom, and they are not evidence of anything. Every one is given a deadline and checked against later coverage, and the score is published on the ledger — including the ones that miss.

  • Awaiting deadline 30% Immediate De-escalation Pact

    Facing escalating maritime insurance costs, the primary external powers and regional actors agree to a temporary, localized de-escalation. Iran announces a reduction in drone frequency, and Houthi forces publicly commit to respecting a specific, pre-defined shipping lane for two weeks.

    Watch for: Joint statement by the US and Iran officials confirming reduced military activity in the Gulf. · Announcement by major shipping insurers reducing premiums for the Bab el-Mandeb passage.

  • Awaiting deadline 35% Targeted Retaliatory Strike

    A major external power (e.g., US or UK) responds to a specific, significant Houthi or Iranian attack on a commercial vessel. The response is limited to the vessel or the infrastructure responsible, rather than a broad military campaign, focusing purely on deterrence.

    Watch for: A specific, named naval vessel engages in an attack on a Houthi missile launch site. · The attacking power issues a public, precise statement detailing the destroyed Houthi/Iranian component.

  • Awaiting deadline 20% Strategic External Pivot (Counter-intuitive)

    Instead of escalating military confrontation, one of the major external powers unexpectedly announces a major infrastructure investment directly into a non-aligned nation bordering one of the straits. This signals a shift from military dominance to the 'Zheng He' model of trade facilitation.

    Watch for: A specific foreign government announces a major, multi-billion dollar port development project in a neutral country near the Strait of Hormuz. · A named official from the external power announces a shift in naval posture away from the straits.

  • Awaiting deadline 15% Localized Houthi/Iranian Economic Action

    The Houthis or Iran leverage the current geopolitical tension to secure a highly specific, short-term economic gain, perhaps by negotiating a temporary tariff or 'toll' for passage. This action is framed as an assertion of sovereign rights over the waterways, mirroring the historical 'cartaz' system.

    Watch for: A spokesperson for the Houthis announces a specific, temporary 'transit fee' for commercial vessels. · A specific international body (e.g., IMO) issues a warning regarding unofficial maritime levies.

Generated by llama on 2026-09-24. Checked against later coverage after 2026-09-27. See how these forecasts score.

ForecastGeo shows the headline and summary published by the newsroom and places the story on a map. The full article lives at the source.