How grief tech is reimagining Victorian spiritualism
Modern spiritualism began as a religious movement in the 19th century. It promised to bring the living and dead together in conversation, usually through a medium – a person who claimed an ability to directly contact the deceased. The core foundational belief of spiritualism was that death was not the end – a typical tenet of many religions – but was the point at which a person departed their physical body and ascended to the spiritual realm. As a faith, spiritualism was an innovation of Christianity. It drew on spiritual communications referenced in the Old Testament and adapted them for those who had become disillusioned with the traditional faith by integrating it with mysticism and science. In Victorian Britain, new rituals that became attached to death expected more from the living. Mourning periods were longer and identifiable by the clothing people wore. Funerals became more elaborate and ritualised. Mourners could also pay for memento mori photographs that captured keepsake images of the dead. Within this exaggerated culture of morbidity, spiritualism became an appealing movement for those who were overcome with grief. In the United States, the movement was galvanised by the huge loss of life and loved ones in the civil war. Many of the dead were unidentified, leading to a lack of closure for those grieving. Making contact The methods spiritualists and mediums used were varied. Seances were conducted where the methods of communication ranged from knocking sounds to levitation, while spirit photography claimed to capture images of the dead standing by their living loved ones. The spirit photo of Mary Todd Lincoln with the ‘ghost’ of her husband, created by William H. Mumler in 1872. The Lincoln Financial Foundation Collection The first spirit photo was taken in 1861 by William Mumler in Boston. It led to a decade of his studio being frequented by bereaved people who hoped to have an image showing that their departed were still with them. Mumler’s studio produced these photos for the price of US$10 (£280 in 2026). They featured the same ghost for multiple images – faded and vague enough to convince those looking for comfort. Mumler was tried for fraud in 1869, but acquitted due to lack of evidence. He went on to photograph Mary Todd Lincoln with the apparent apparition of Abraham Lincoln. Spirit photography was convincing in the 19th century in part because of the lack of likenesses that were left behind when a person died. A shaded photo or likewise a knock at a table, perhaps with a message of assurance from the mouth of a medium, were a balm that gave mourners comfort. Our 21st-century ghosts In the present day, our existence is preserved on phones, cameras and social media. There are recordings that keep peoples’ voices alive after they leave us. But for some, as with those who were drawn to spiritualism, that limited snapshot isn’t enough. AI grief tech is developing to patch the holes that bereavement leaves – and clearly when so much remains of a person’s life, a spirit photo will no longer do. These systems, known as griefbots, AI ghosts, deathbots or postmortem avatars, offer services from text interaction to phone calls to full video calls. Should AI be allowed to resurrect the dead? In 2020 the South Korean documentary Meeting You showed a grieving mother being reunited with her deceased daughter through the use of a VR headset and gloves. The documentary showed Jang Ji-sung trying to touch the projection of her daughter – an action reminiscent of Victorian séance attendees reaching to try to touch the glowing ghosts that had seemingly manifested. Clips from the South Korean VR documentary Meeting You. Since 2020, grief tech has developed significantly and caters to a range of budgets. Grief tech companies like You, Only Virtual allow users to build and chat with a virtual personality for US$20 (£15) a month. AI-generated photos and videos of deceased or missing serviceman have meanwhile increased in popularity in Russia. They cost between 200 and 10,000 roubles (£2-£100), with significantly varied quality. There are also systems that offer enhanced “companions”, depending on someone’s budget. AI ghosts can be pre-made by the living, recording their voice and image for their loved ones to aid with grief therapy. These set ups can cost up to US$15,000. A spectre (from an album of doppelgängers and spectres, early 1900s), artist unknown. John Rylands Research Institute and Library, CC BY-NC There are concerns and studies discussing both the ethics of AI griefbots and the impact that these services may have on the grieving process. Issues of consent are a key consideration. Where Victorian mediums represented the deceased through words and actions, griefbots are a recreation of a person’s life based off their data. These concerns are lessened when the deceased has pre-consented, but not for those that are created by living loved ones. In a way reminiscent to followers of spiritualism continuing to pay to attend séances, the subscription nature of some of these AI systems keep the bereaved coming back. This raises a concerning question: are you losing your loved one again if you cancel the subscription? The onus lies with the living users to be able to know when they have grieved enough. Similar concerns were raised over exploitation by spiritualists of their patrons when they were most vulnerable. English author M. E. Darby wrote his 1888 book An Investigation of Modern Spiritualism: An Exposé “a warning and guide to the innocent and over-credulous young men”, who were “a ready prey for the unscrupulous and inhuman professional practitioner of legerdemain, who cruelly, out of the most tender ties, feelings, and emotions of human bosoms, make a harvest and find a ready spoil”. Harry Houdini in 1913. Campbell-Gray, Ltd. Concerns over the financial exploitation of the spiritualism movement were still being raised in the early 20th century by the illusionist Harry Houdini, who tried to expose frauds. One of Houdini’s earliest acts, with his wife Bess, had been a séance show through which Houdini became familiar with the ways in which a medium could deceive their audience. By the 1920s, he used his reputation to demonstrate how electrical wires created floating objects, how mediums used their feet to ring bells, and other tricks immediately familiar to a fellow magician. Houdini’s scepticism of spiritualism led to him promising that upon his death, if possible, he would return on a set date and give his widow Bess a code phrase to identify himself. No such contact was made. The rise of grief tech, with its parallels to spiritualism, confirms one consistency in the human condition: a desire to minimise the pain of loss. While understandable, the latest advancements add a confusing twist to the process and psychology of grief, without data currently available to better understand the long-term impact. Until we have better clarity, and have navigated the ethics more thoroughly, we should consider closing the parlour doors on grief tech. Jessica Lloyd May does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Where: United States, Boston, Russia
Exact coordinates
united states: 37.090, -95.710
boston: 42.360, -71.060
russia: 61.520, 105.320
Read it at The Conversation See this on the map
What might happen next? AI-generated
These scenarios are written by an AI language model from the headline and summary above. They are not predictions from the newsroom, and they are not evidence of anything. Every one is given a deadline and checked against later coverage, and the score is published on the ledger — including the ones that miss.
-
Awaiting deadline 40% Regulatory Intervention and Consumer Protection Laws
Following a high-profile case where an elderly widow lost her life savings to a fraudulent AI grief service, a coalition of consumer protection agencies in the EU and US initiates strict regulations on 'post-mortem digital services.' These laws mandate clear disclosure of AI nature, prohibit indefinite subscription models without explicit renewal consent, and require a 'right to disconnect' clause for grieving users.
Watch for: The European Commission introduces the 'Digital Legacy Act' requiring mandatory labeling of AI-generated deceased avatars · The US Federal Trade Commission issues a cease-and-desist order against top grief tech firm 'AfterLife AI' for deceptive marketing practices
-
Awaiting deadline 30% Mainstream Therapeutic Integration with Consent Mandates
Major psychological associations and hospital systems begin integrating AI grief tools as adjunctive therapy for PTSD and prolonged grief disorder, but only under strict protocols. Services become licensed medical devices requiring pre-consent from the deceased (via digital wills) and supervised usage by licensed therapists to prevent emotional dependency, effectively legitimizing the technology while curbing the 'wild west' of unregulated apps.
Watch for: The American Psychological Association publishes guidelines endorsing AI-assisted grief counseling for verified bereaved patients with prior digital consent · Johns Hopkins Hospital announces a pilot program using licensed AI avatars for veterans' families, restricted to clinical settings
-
Awaiting deadline 20% Cultural Backlash and the 'Digital Clean Death' Movement
A viral social media campaign led by grief counselors and tech ethicists condemns 'digital necrophilia,' framing AI resurrection as an obstruction to natural healing. This triggers a cultural shift where high-income demographics begin adopting 'digital clean death' practices, deleting social media accounts post-mortem to prevent AI scraping, and stigmatizing users of grief bots as 'unable to let go,' causing a sharp decline in voluntary consumer adoption.
Watch for: Meta and Google announce default settings to permanently delete all user data 30 days after verified death notification, overriding user archives · A global trend on TikTok labeled #LetThemGo gains over 10 million views, featuring influencers deleting their own digital footprints
-
Awaiting deadline 10% Legal Precedent Establishing Post-Mortem Digital Personhood
In a landmark ruling, a court in California recognizes that a deceased individual's AI avatar possesses limited 'digital rights' against unauthorized commercial exploitation by third-party grief tech companies, even without explicit pre-death consent. This forces the industry to pivot from user-generated content to a licensed model where estates must approve any commercial use of the deceased's likeness, creating a new estate planning sector focused on digital assets.
Watch for: The California Supreme Court rules in 'Estate of Doe v. GriefTech Inc.' that unauthorized AI replicas violate the Right of Publicity post-mortem · New estate planning firms launch specialized 'Digital Avatar Trusts' to manage and monetize deceased relatives' AI personas
Generated by Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q5_K_M.gguf
on 2026-08-01. Checked against later coverage after 2027-07-27.
See how these forecasts score.
ForecastGeo shows the headline and summary published by the newsroom and places the story on a map. The full article lives at the source.