Hearing set to decide 'terror sentencing' of activists who targeted Barclays
Hearing set to decide 'terror sentencing' of activists who targeted Barclays MEE staff on Thu, 08/06/2026 - 14:28 Judge Altham, who previously issued 'manifestly excessive' sentences to anti-fracking activists, is set to determine whether the offences carry a 'terrorist connection' The defendants allegedly spray painted and splintered windows at a Barclays bank branch in Burnley over its shares in Elbit Systems in August 2024 (Supplied) Off A judge has ordered a hearing in which he will decide whether five Palestine Action defendants convicted of criminal damage will be sentenced as terrorists. The five defendants - Brendon O’Hagan, 28, Amanda Kelly, 31, Hmeera Atiqnisar, 31, Mohammed Malik, 28, and Alma Yaniv, 70 - were found guilty in June 2026 of causing £212,000 ($283,000) worth of damage to a Barclays branch in Burnley in August 2024. Following their convictions, presiding Judge Phillip Parry told defence lawyers that he would consider applying a “terrorist connection”, despite jurors not being told about a potential terror sentencing in the case. He then referred the matter to Judge Robert Altham who will decide whether to apply the terror designation at a hearing on 21 August, two weeks ahead of their sentencing on 4 September. In 2018, the court of appeal found that Judge Altham had issued "manifestly excessive" prison sentences to anti-fracking activists for causing public nuisance outside a site near Blackpool. The court ruled that the sentences were inappropriate and that the activists should be freed immediately. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); After the Barclays trial concluded, Judge Parry circulated a ruling made by Justice Johnson, the presiding judge in a recent Palestine Action case in which four activists convicted of criminal damage at an Elbit Systems site in Filton, near Bristol, were sentenced as terrorists despite being convicted of criminal charges. Gross overreach The CPS subsequently argued that the defendants should receive a terror sentencing, despite not mentioning the possibility during the trial. ‘We just disappeared’: Palestine Action defendant recalls ‘horrifying’ arrest Read More » The Barclays action took place prior to the proscription of Palestine Action and is not listed among the three incidents connected to the group which the government classified as terrorism, each allegedly involving over £1m ($1.35m) in damage. Simon Roscoe Blevins, an anti-fracking activist who was handed a 16-month custodial sentence by Altham in 2018, said: "Surely this move to add a terror connection to the sentencing of another direct action case, after no mention before or during trial, is another gross overreach and one he in particular cannot be trusted with?" Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori said that it was "shocking" that Altham is deciding whether the terrorist designation will be applied. She added that both in the Filton case and the Barclays case "the jury were under the impression that they were simply deciding whether criminal damage was caused. They were completely unaware that a conviction of criminal damage, would essentially be convicting the defendants of terrorism". Palestine Action News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0
Where: Israel
Exact coordinates
israel: 31.050, 34.850
Read it at Section Feed See this on the map
What might happen next? AI-generated
These scenarios are written by an AI language model from the headline and summary above. They are not predictions from the newsroom, and they are not evidence of anything. Every one is given a deadline and checked against later coverage, and the score is published on the ledger — including the ones that miss.
ForecastGeo shows the headline and summary published by the newsroom and places the story on a map. The full article lives at the source.